Building Difficult Technology

When thinking about what I want to work on, I am most inspired by deep tech/hard tech/high tech/whatever-you-call-it tech. I love the ambition of it.

I would be happy if more people and companies working on those inspiring challenges. And I want to help them. But how? How can we do that?

The advice from Paul Graham in how to have startup ideas is to get to the edge of a technology (either as a user or creator) and build what is missing. Does this advice apply to hard problems or only product market fit type problems?

According to Jered Friedman most of Y Combinator advice still applies to hard tech companies and Sam Altman says the same. (Sorry itā€™s always Y Combinator sources, but they have great resourses).

Applicable YC advice They claim starting a hard tech company is easier than a ā€œnormal companyā€ AND that most of the advice out there is still useful to you. Good news eh? slides

So thereā€™s resources with blueprints for how we can get going. But still, donā€™t you need to be special to work on these types of problems? Like, really special .

I can imagine that if I go home at Christmas and say that Iā€™d like to develop a cheaper drilling method for geothermal energy wells, I would get some strange looks. If I said Iā€™m aiming for wells that are kilometers deep I would feel that I am saying something ridiculous. Something impossible.

But there are examples of people that just started working on something huge without any extraordinary genius advantage. John Crowley built a biotech company for his daughters. Blake Scholl (a software engineer) started a supersonic aeroplane company because he liked planes.

His company Boom isnā€™t yet a home run winner, but thatā€™s not the point. The point is that they are trying something extremely ambitious and that they arenā€™t aliens, just American. Snippets from an interview with Blake Scholl show it:

TC: Blake, you [spent a handful of years with Amazon, working on mobile shopping, then Groupon acquired a mobile payment company youā€™d co-founded, Kima Labs, and you stayed on]. So youā€™re at Groupon. You donā€™t have an aerospace background. But you decide that you are the guy to start a supersonic jet company. How did that happen?

BS: It goes back to the decision I made to sell [Kima Labs] . . . I thought, is it worth what I will go through personally for the product weā€™re building, or should I take the great offer and live to found another day? And so I took the offer, and in reflecting on that, what I realized is, like, all startups are hard. Thereā€™s no such thing as an easy startupā€¦

My personal passion for a long time had been airplanesā€¦ And so I thought, I have to look at the supersonic thing that Iā€™ve been sort of thinking about for a decade, and do some research, and probably get it out of my system.

The first thing was to understand why it hadnā€™t been done alreadyā€¦

[So I went back to] first principles and [thought], the Concorde was created 50 years ago with slide rules and wind tunnels. And half a century later, [I wondered] why is that not working, and what would it take, and the answer was that the fuel economy was the problem. It was too expensive to operate, [so] none of the people could afford to fly on it. And you start to run the numbers and say, well ā€” by the way, all this stuff you can do out of Wikipedia ā€” what would you have to do to make this economically feasible? It turns out the answer is [to make the fuel efficiency] 30% [better] versus what was designed a long time ago. And you start to realize, that doesnā€™t sound impossible. [So] I went off and read some aerospace textbooks, and took a design class, and started to meet everybody I could find in the industry, and I told them to shoot holes in my idea. And eventually, people started saying, ā€˜No, this actually makes sense.ā€™ And so we started the company.

When I talk to English friends about languages they often say things like ā€œI wish Iā€™d tried to learn when I was young, it wouldā€™ve been so easyā€¦ itā€™s too late nowā€. But thatā€™s self-delusion. Thatā€™s putting work on a version of yourself that isnā€™t you.

Itā€™s not too late. You didnā€™t have to start when you were six, you have to start now and keep trying and for 6 months you need to sound stupid when you talk.

I feel that same cop-out thinking when Iā€™m considering hard technology problems. Iā€™m not a genius. I didnā€™t build a bomb when I was 12. I was playing fifa at age 15, not hacking into government databases. I feel ridiculous at the thought of trying anything outlandish.

I hope that is wrong. If everything remarkable had to be done by a genius, surely we wouldnā€™t be as far as we are now? Surely the lucky ones of us who can just need to dare?

I think some advice I once got from someone who isnā€™t in Y Combinator may be useful. During my masters I was studying gaussian processes on the train and understanding none of it, the guy opposite me got up to leave, and as he was going he said

ā€œIf it was easy, weā€™d all be doing it. Stick at it.ā€

Stick at it.